NWBC is cheaper compared to portal.
You can refer these blogs and this important note 0001685257
NWBC is cheaper compared to portal.
You can refer these blogs and this important note 0001685257
Hola
has intentado habilitas la opcion en el firewall de que permita pasar la aplicacion de SAP.
Segun las notas el 8.82 no es 100% compatible con el 2012 tambien podria ser esa la cuestion.
Saludos
Hi Ann
Planning Calendar is used for the MRP/MPS run in order to set the plan documents (PlanOrders / PurReq) in specific days.
I think it dont have relation with Demand Spliting. Here you can see other post about IndepRequirements Split.
http://scn.sap.com/message/14142739
Arturo.
Hi for your final, you just need to put a data element of length 6 or 7 (6would be sufficient) and decimals 3. It will work fine.
Try DE ABRST, ANZHL,These are all decimals 2.
Go to Se11, and click F4 on dataelement, giving datatype as dec and length 6 or 7, Choose a data element with 3 decimals
Hi Kothapalli,
It is a very well depicted documnt however instead of the numbers at the first column, which is used for sorting, I see #MULTIVALUE.
Hi Bharadwaj,
If I understood your requirement correctly then its showing attribute not bound because there is no value for the attribute in BOL to show .
Now if you do not want to show aatribute not bound message in UI then go to TC 'su01' and assign the below given parameter to your user .
Thanks
Kumar Gaurav.
Dear,
In this case ,dont maintain F2 or F1 in Order related Billing and Delivery related billing in that Sales Document Type and dont maintain Copying control b/w Sales Document Type and Billing Type then check by running one cycle and let me know ,how system is treating you .
Thanks,
Naren
Hi Kiran,
there are several approaches to achieve this.
You can define mandatory single value variables in filter and/or function which are set by web item selection. If no line is selected this variable stays empty and on execution the variable Dialog will popup requiring the missing variable values to be entered.
Another variant would be using the Selection Exit for planning functions.
Hinweis 1101726 - Aktiven Filter von Planungsfunktionen verändern
Here you can check c_t_charsel and if any Information/Restriction is missing raise exception empty accompanied with some error message.
Using a customer Extension item to Access the variable Container is an Option too - but compared to the first two a rather complicated.
And there might be a way using JS to check wether or not a line is marked before executing the planning sequence.
Hope this helps.
Nils
Hi Rafi
I am facing the same problem .can you please let me know the solution how did u resolved it .
Thanks & Regards
Deepika
Hi,
TransactionNotification is one of the two SP given by SAP that you can modify to fulfill your needs (basically do some controls). You can search on the SCN, you'll find some references about it.
In your case, the control to add is the following:
IF@object_type='24'AND@transaction_type='A'
BEGIN
DECLARE@CheckNumint
SELECT@CheckNum=R1.CheckNum
FROMRCT1R1
INNERJOINORCTR0ONR1.DocNum=R0.DocEntry
WHERER0.DocEntry=@list_of_cols_val_tab_del
GROUPBYR1.CheckNum,R0.CardCode
HAVINGCOUNT(*)> 0
IFISNULL(@CheckNum, 0)<> 0
BEGIN
SELECT@error= 1,@error_message='Check number for this customer has already been entered'
END
END
Regards,
Eric
You could use Excel, concatenate and vlookup to run some comparisons on the AGR_1251 data for your old and new roles. But all you would be doing is replacing 50 small bad roles with 1 big bad role.
You've come across this requirement because the original roles were built badly, and effectively you're having to carry out a role redesign. In which case, the correct solution would be to:
1) Use ST01 traces to re-check what authorizations are required for each transaction - this way you know for sure that you know you are only adding relevant authorizations.
2) Update SU24 with the correct authorization proposals for those transactions. That way you have a link between each tcode and auths that it needs.
3) Add your transactions to the role menu so that the relevant auth objects and values are pulled through automatically. You will still have some open fields to maintain, but you'll know what values are needed from the trace files.
This will take you longer initially, but it is a more robust, longer lasting solution. There is no point in replacing one bad role design with another.
We are on V6R1.
After reorganizing a physical file (table STXH) with command "RGZPFM FILE(R3AP5DATA/STXH)"
I found out that some duplicate records exist.
Then I used Note 116192 - IBM i: SQL error -7008 to carry on (reason code 9, case a).
But the command DSPPFM R3<SID>DATA/<file name> in step 5 does not show any useful data
so I can't find out which records are duplicate ones.
Another try was this SQL command using the "record row number" but it runs forever (I had to cancel it after 22 hours runtime):
DELETE FROM STXH F1 WHERE RRN(F1) < (select MAX(RRN(F2)) FROM STXH F2 WHERE F2.MANDT=F1.MANDT AND F2.TDREFOBJ=F1.TDREFOBJ AND F2.TDREFNAME=F1.TDREFNAME AND F2.TDREFID=F1.TDREFID)
Any idea how to get rid of these duplicate rows?
Cheers,
Rüdiger
P.S. The table STXH is quite big: approx. 48 millions rows.
Hi,
According to me, the Asset Balance Report gives details about all the things like acquisitions, retirement, transfers, etc. But asset acquisition will give limited details only. Kindly share the input screen parameters for both the reports.
Regards,
Malhar
Hi Imran,
Yes you can get the entity by using relation name as specified in relationship as i think.
Try to implement that one .
Regards,
Hello
Check these SAP notes:
Note 706478 - Preventing Basis tables from increasing considerably
1783696 - SM/OPTSTAT is consuming huge space within SYSAUX Tablespace
Regards
RB
Hi Angel,
The payroll area is not technically bound to the ee group.
It's only for organising your payroll. If one of your groups is weekly paid and the others monthly, then you'd need at least to payroll areas.
But there is no technical link (you can create one, if you want to, with feature ABKRS, if your ee groups reflect your payroll organisation).
Criteria for PY areas:
- country
- frequency
- date payroll is run
- who is running it
- further criteria depending on country. E.g. In the UK tax district no is determined by payroll area. Therefore, I recommend you let us know, which country you are talking about, so that local experts have a chance to comment on it.
Kind regards
Sven
Hi SUdhir,
Please have Delivery Block at transaction Type (VOV8 t-code) config level.
Then on receipt of payment, you can go ahead and release the delivery block manually and do the delivery creation.
Regards
Hi Suresh,
Well, at least you know which user it is, Basis/100, and what time exactly it happened every day.
Maybe you can start a trace-by-userid slightly before the time it will happened, and also check where is this RFC came from during that time (dev_rfc log, sm59).
In the meantime, you can change the user-type to either System or Service user, depending if you need to login via SAPGUI or not).
I hope this will help you.
Regards,
Andre
ya i will create a proforma invoice manually.
is there any configuration setting which will avoid me to go to va02 to remove the block?
Cant we configure or use any user exit which will directly link the payments and delivery process?
for example once the payments are done delivery block is removed.... .
Dear Darshan
All of your settings seems to be correct my attention also went to point no.10 only as mentioned by Ajay Sir also but as you say you have done confirmation again but the situation is the same. Now please check following points also.
1 May be your production lot size or the activity quantities are too small hence the system is unable to calculate activity cost for Production Order. Ideally Costing Lot Size,Routing base quantity and order size should be the same to avoid calculation differences due to rounding.
2 Check production version used for Standard Cost and for Production order. Whether the two are same or different. If different the activities used in production version used for Production order are properly maintained and also check validity of those activities.
If even then it is not solved then please give screen shots of your activity master,KP26,routing and Cost analysis.
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena