Hi....
If you transfer billing document from SD to co-pa
without costing key, co-pa don’t get cost component data of Standard COGS.
Using t-code KE21N, You can create direct co-pa document,which
have cost component data of Standard COGS, releated to billing document.
But SAP don’t occur FI document as soon as MM document
is created because Material which have price control “S” don’t have Standard cost.
Through monthly actual costing job, you can create FI document which have actual COGS.
Praveen,
Where is it showing up ... in some cases - if you have done a repartitioning of the cube - the shadow tables dont get deleted in the database even though the original infoprovider might have got deleted.
Is it showing up at the database level or in the BW system when you do specific checks etc ..?
after I configure these value categories in SPRO, which t-codeI can use to see them, PM order master data IW33?
after you configure OIKS, can I use IW33 to see panned cost?
Hi Vinay,
The number range under spro is used for defining the range for the master data that we create.
By default the number range 01$$ is provided.
Now open the node of number range select this particular entry and click on Number Range Maintenance and then Interval.
There you will find the Number Range that is defined.
Its IN 50000000 and 99999999 which means that when in the system we start creating the master data say organization, process , subprocess , etc the ID created corresponding to that will start from 50000000. In this link you can also see the current range means till waht ID the master data has been created.
This setting is common to all the components.
Hope this answers your question.
Regards,
Silky
I tried testing this a number of ways (regarding the referential join within an Attribute View), and could not validate that the referential join is meaningful within the context of an attribute view, even when executed from an analytic view.
If the idea is that the attribute view referential join will be a left only when a value from the right table is selected, I don't really see a scenario where this would be beneficial in an attribute view as most of the time the left table (which would hold the keys) in an attribute view will be the most granular level - ie KNVV (left) joined to KNA1 (right) N:1. The join to KNA1 in the attribute view may be avoided if no right fields are selected, but then again it may be cheaper to wrap KNA1 in an attribute view itself and join to the data foundation instead.
That being said, the referential join from a data foundation to an Attribute view within the Analytic View acting as a Left Outer if none of the right table fields are selected (all attribute views would be considered as a right table), is certainly of high value to eliminate unnecessary joins with the star.
In my testing, essentially no matter what I did, the attribute view still acted as an inner. However, the fact to attribute behaved as expected - it was a left outer when no right table fields were selected (skip to last 2 statements for that example).
Just wanted to share findings to further the discussion.
Thanks,
Justin
CREATE COLUMN TABLE "SYSTEM"."TEST_LEFT" ("MATNR" VARCHAR(18))
CREATE COLUMN TABLE "SYSTEM"."TEST_RIGHT" ("MATNR" VARCHAR(18),
"MAT_TEXT" VARCHAR(20))
insert into "SYSTEM"."TEST_LEFT" values('12345')
insert into "SYSTEM"."TEST_LEFT" values('67891')
insert into "SYSTEM"."TEST_LEFT" values('55667')
insert into "SYSTEM"."TEST_RIGHT" values('12345','TEST_12345')
insert into "SYSTEM"."TEST_RIGHT" values('67891','TEST_67891')
CREATE Attribute view, TEST_LEFT.MATNR as key attribute, referential join 1:N
Resulting XML
<join cardinality="C1_N" joinType="referential" leftInput="#//Data Foundation/"SYSTEM".TEST_LEFT" rightInput="#//Data Foundation/"SYSTEM".TEST_RIGHT" textJoin="false">
<leftElementName>MATNR</leftElementName>
<rightElementName>MATNR</rightElementName>
</join>
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "_SYS_BIC"."copa-poc/AT_TEST_REFERENTIAL"
RESULT: 2
SELECT COUNT(MATNR) FROM "_SYS_BIC"."copa-poc/AT_TEST_REFERENTIAL"
RESULT: 2
SELECT MATNR FROM "_SYS_BIC"."copa-poc/AT_TEST_REFERENTIAL"
RESULT
MATNR
12345
67891
create column table "SYSTEM"."TEST_FACT"( "MATNR" VARCHAR (18) null,
"SALES_VAL" DECIMAL (15,
2) not null)
insert into "SYSTEM"."TEST_FACT" values('12345',500.00)
insert into "SYSTEM"."TEST_FACT" values('11111',500.00)
insert into "SYSTEM"."TEST_FACT" values('67891',500.00)
insert into "SYSTEM"."TEST_FACT" values('55667', 500.00)
insert into "SYSTEM"."TEST_FACT" values('67891',500.00)
CREATE ANALYTIC view, AT_TEST_REFERENTIAL, TEST_FACT
<join cardinality="CN_1" joinType="referential" leftInput="#//Logical Join/Data Foundation" rightInput="#//Logical Join/copa-poc::AT_TEST_REFERENTIAL" textJoin="false">
<leftElementName>MATNR_1</leftElementName>
<rightElementName>MATNR</rightElementName>
</join>
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "_SYS_BIC"."copa-poc/AN_TEST_REFERENTIAL"
RESULT: 2
SELECT COUNT(MATNR) FROM "_SYS_BIC"."copa-poc/AN_TEST_REFERENTIAL"
RESULT: 2
SELECT COUNT(MATNR) FROM "_SYS_BIC"."copa-poc/AN_TEST_REFERENTIAL"
RESULT: 4
SELECT COUNT(MAT_TEXT) FROM "_SYS_BIC"."copa-poc/AN_TEST_REFERENTIAL"
RESULT: 4
SELECT SUM(SALES_VAL) FROM "_SYS_BIC"."copa-poc/AN_TEST_REFERENTIAL"
SUM(SALES_VAL)
2,500
SELECT MATNR, SUM(SALES_VAL) FROM "_SYS_BIC"."copa-poc/AN_TEST_REFERENTIAL"
GROUP BY MATNR
MATNR;SUM(SALES_VAL)
12345;500
55667;500
67891;1,000
Splitting is not possible with this Bapi.
For splitting you have to build your own logic like running this bapi twice for posting.
Hi Experts,
The environment:
MS BPC 10
MS SQL 2012
Visual Studio 2010 (BIDS)
I would like a SSIS data package to run SPRUNVALID and SPRUNCONVERSION (which are both in the DEFAULT.LGF) after the data load to the fact table (I used both tblFAC2Model and tblFACTWBModel to load data to test). After loading and optimising, neither of the stored procedures worked. I understand that the default logic will work in input sheets and journals (if JOURNALS.LGF is set up). The input sheets update tblFACTWBModel table, so I thought maybe this will work with SSIS data package, but it didn't.
These 2 currently works in EPM input sheets and in the data manager package.
However, running either from the SSIS package does not process any record. I tried running the Validate.dstx (this runs SPRUNVALID stored procedure called from EPM), but this does not work either.
Has anyone tried to run business rules or FX translation from BIDS?
Here is the code of requirement 22 (LV61A022, Inter-company).
* Inter company transaction
form kobed_022.
sy-subrc = 4.
check: komp-werks ne space.
check: komp-fareg na '45'.
if komk-vbtyp ca vbtyp_fkiv.
sy-subrc = 0.
exit.
endif.
if komp-kposn ne 0.
check komp-prsfd ca 'BX'.
check t001-bukrs ne t001k-bukrs.
endif.
sy-subrc = 0.
endform.
* Prestep
form kobev_022.
sy-subrc = 0.
endform.
No idea why condition A and B behaves in different ways with this requirement.
yu
Hi Marla,
Please work with the basis team to identify if the required background jobs have been scheduled to delete the GRC jobs:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/c4/3a7ede505211d189550000e829fbbd/content.htm
GRC doesn't have any mechanism to delete its jobs itself.
Best Regards,
Nandita
Thank you.
I understood your answer, but when i run the O4L6 (Create Shipping Cost documents in) a brand new entry is creating in KONV, I am trying to figure out where (prog. / form / FM) these KONV records are created
I guess, i need to debug more keenly. We are IS-OIL
Hello Verono,
Thanks for the reply. We have also resolved the problem by deleting SNC_LIB entry from System Variable.
Kind Regards
Manna Das
Hi ,
In addition to above experts replies ,i would like to share some more inputs on this subject.
Case 1 :- If discount on material price ,it would be statistical while create the Purchase order. ( GRIR Price is ( Material price - Discount).
Case 2 :- If discount on total invoice value and separately shown vendor tax invoice it would be post while posting the Invoice through MIRO & Entry as follows. ( Base amount to be consider as per accounting standard)
GRIR Clearing account.........Dr
To Vendor...............................Cr
To Discount received .............Cr
No impact on material price.
Case 3 :- If discount given on payment side like if we paid with in 10 days 10% discount like.
No impact on material price or material GL account. Payment entry as follows ,if you get discount against payment.
Vendor ..............Dr
To Bank clearing account.......Cr
To Discount Received.............Cr.
I hope you understand.
Regards
Mani
Hi Friends,
We recently did a Quality system refresh from Production. While I am trying to do quota generation in quality system, I am getting error "No entry in table T556A for key 20201 at 20130101". But, I could generate quota in Production and no changes happened to any configuration or emp group/subgroup.
Please help me.
Thanks,
Regards,
S.Srikanth
HI Nizaar,
To clear your doubt..
Please check https://websmp104.sapag.de/~sapidb/011000358700001186692007E
When you have planned to an High Availability landscape for NW PI, then only we use ASCS for ABAP cluster. However, JAVA always uses the case of clustering as it reduces communication burden using MS in SCS as a gateway to router information and communication between java nodes, while this approach concentrates the possible single points of failure of a system into a single instance and, therefore, ensures isolation just on them.
Rest, ASCS and SCS were always a part in case of HA environments.
Regards,
Divyanshu
Hi Godavari,
Please check mentioned notes are relevant
Note 1884651 - AS01,AS02: Short-dump during save changes in CSMD for assets
1609794 - Short dump ASSERTION_FAILED in Asset Transactions (table-field ANLA-HAS_TDDP
Regards
Mani
Hi,
Does any one has experience running the tool SWLT. I do no find any documentation related to the tool.
Can someone through an insight.
Thanks in advance
Ashish Singh
Hi Gilberto Parga
Use Transaction code - search_sap_menu
Helpful links
http://www.gotothings.com/sapbs007.htm
Hi Stacey,
This is a right behavior. When you have 2 roles (Test1 & Test2) with same tcodes and mitigate only one role (say Test1) and try to run the Risk analysis at ROLE level, you will see the actual difference in RESULTS for both the roles.
However, when it comes at USER level (considering you have including Role level mitigation in User Analysis), it is always a Risk (irrespective of the role from where it comes) for a USER. Here Role level mitigation will now turn towards USER level with Risk ID. User is mitigated now with particular risk and that is irrespective how many roles has that same risk. So system will show all the roles as mitigated, because user is mitigated for that risk.
This does not sound good, if we mitigate one user with one role for one risk and do the same activitiy for same risk for different roles.
Thanks & Regards
Neeraj
Hi Allison,
When employee got terminated, his HSA plan has been delimited? Usually HSA plan is dependant on some other Plan ( Medical Plan).
e.g:. CDHP Health Plan ( IT1067) combines with HSA plan (IT0169)where employee can enrol for HSA plan at any time and can with draw. But Employer has to contribute irrespective of whether employee contributes or not.
So, when CDHP plan stops, HSA also stops automatically for employee. So, is it the same scenario with yours? Also check what is happening in the payroll. Check payroll results and the IT0167 records.
If employee is changing his benefit elections from portal, what is his current status?
Thanks,
Madhav.
Dear Ahm
Following is my suggestion for your plan:
(1) Enter the material planned standard price in MM as Material Price (MM03)
Why this is required through planned price? Whether your valuation variant requires this? If not then you should give prices through MR21.
(8) Confirming activities on Sep 8th once actual are there (CO15)
Confirm the activities at the time of order confirmations and later on calculate actual price for activity and revalue your orders on 8th Sept.
(9) Perform Goods issues,Goods Receipts, and Transfer (MIGO,MIRO) on Sep 8th
Do above activities on actual dates.
Rest seems to be OK
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena
