Hi Suraj,
"Alternatively, I have used a code for TilesContainer, from SAPUI5 and is in HTML/Javascript."
Do you still have the JS for this case? Please share, if you do.
Thanks.
Hi Suraj,
"Alternatively, I have used a code for TilesContainer, from SAPUI5 and is in HTML/Javascript."
Do you still have the JS for this case? Please share, if you do.
Thanks.
Dear all
I have One requirement form customer in Tcode ME35K
This tcode is to release contract, but when I choose search help in Release code field, all of release code of all release group of PO, Contract and RFQ. I want to limit of search help only display release code of Contract.
This is SAP standard? If we can config, please help me.
Thank you so so much much much.
Hi Harish,
Thanks a lot.
I am going to ask to my technical team to check if we can follow your steps in our ECC.
The goal all of this is to be able to provide the requested material certification to our customers.
With the changes of the market conditions, we should be more agile and able to provide material certifications when customers request them. We can have multiple certifications for the material used a production batch.
Do you think that batch classification can help in this case?
Have you faced same requests these last years?
Thanks.
Sandra.
Hello Zubin
You can go through the link posted by me for step by step file upload process -
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-50178
Regarding your question - You have to load the Company - Nothing but Trading partner's first in MDG hub. You have a option to load the same. Once it is done, load all the GL at COA level then your operational GL accounts.
Kiran
Dear SAP experts,
We are in SAP ECC 6 EHP 7. We are exploring the ATP functionality. We know that for items which have
been reserved through PM Work order or SD Sales Order will reduce the available stock, which can be seen
in CO09. We also know that we can manually intervene to reduce the confirmed quantity for each element by
using CO06.
Eg. I have 10 pcs in stock, and then reserved 7 pcs through reservation from PM Work Order 1; which then I
would have 3 as ATP quantity. If I then have another urgent PM Work Order 2 for 10 pcs, normally i would not
be able to confirm the whole quantity, but using CO06 I can reduce the confirmed quantity of PM Work Order 1
to become 0 pc, and then I can divert this into PM Work Order 2 so it can have confirmed quantity of 10 pcs).
The below can be done using CO06, but then it seems we cannot do the same with the reservation we
manually create, instead we got this error message 'Please select a line that can be changed' - (please see the
picture below).
The question is: how can I update the confirmed quantity in reservation (eg. to reduce it), without need to
change the actual reserved quantity?
Best regards,
John
Hi all,
Thanks for your feedback. This is really appreciated.
The goal all of my initial question is to be able to provide any requested material certification to our customers without multiplying the material codes in our ECC.
With the changes of the market conditions, we should be more agile and able to provide material certifications when customers request them. We can have multiple certifications for the material used in a production batch (ie: country of origin: Brazil and GMO free).
Do you think that batch classification can help in this case?
Have you faced same requests these last years?
Thanks.
Sandra.
Hi Jogeswara,
It is weird that the breakdown on Malfunction and Required date are dependent in our system.
But in IDES, if I reverse the breakfast tick in Malfunction, the other one is changed accordingly.
I wonder how to make them linked.
Thank you,
Sally
Hi,
I'd like to be able to build something into WebI via Web Intelligence UI Extension Points, that can change a dataprovider for a report from one Universe to another Universe (unv to unx in this case)
I know it's possible via RESTful Web Services, but I'd like to do it from within an Extension.
The documentation for 4.1 shows a WebIntelligence Service JavaScript method WebiServices.document.updateDataProvider but it doesn't seem to take an argument for a new UniverseId.
Is there another way to do this via the JavaScript API ? If not is this something that might be added to the WebIntelligence Service JavaScript API in 4.2 ?
If the answer to both of these is no, is there a way of accessing the RESTful Web Services calls from within the WebIntelligence Service JavaScript API without having to make another call to create a session etc ?
Thanks,
Hayden
Hi Amey,
Please check the RFC connection in Backend side.
There might be some connection issue in backend for that RFC causing you the exception.
Manas
Hi ,
Please provide me the questions for HANA certification related to Data modelling,Provisioning, analytic privileges,hierarchies.
Approaching SAP HANA Modeling (Quick overview of HANA Architecture).
Connecting Tables (different join techniques in HANA).
Processing information models (attribute, analytic and calculation views).
Assigning roles and Analytic Privileges.
Full text search.
Thanks in advance..!!!
Regards,
Pratibha
Dear Experts,
Iflow is BPE to SFDC, there is a Java mapping (used for complex mapping) + MM + xslt in the Operational mapping
This IFlow was executed from 10+ messages at almost same time, found issue in only one of the message.
payload before mapping is correct but payload after mapping is different, its wrong, its output of some other message, that message is not belongs/related to adjacent messages executed at the same time.
I have tested OM in ESR using above payload, it generates proper output. But at runtime After mapping payload is different. I don't know how to find the root cause of this issue. I guess something wrong in the Java mapping.
In my old thred : Java mapping Issue : Parallel processing issue similar kind of issue was reported. as a solution I have removed the static variables (removed the key word static before variable), below is the screen shot.
Why new issue with this java mapping, What I have to check in Java mapping? assist me here please.
Let me know if you need further information.
reg, avinash
Hi Pushkar,
Please check the below url for the documention
Try out the SAP HANA Cloud Platform Internet of Things (IoT) services
Regards,
Teja.
Hello Jason
1) In the latest version, Adding an entry in the link databases and schemas is equivalant to creating a trial instance.
please refer to below link
HANA Instance option does not appear in HANA clound cockpit
2) with respect to the screen shot which you have provided, it indicates, you have created a trial instance. Now in order to create hana xs application, you need to go to the sap hana web based development workbench.
3) Just click on the schema id "dev" which you have provided in the above screen shot, it will take you to the hana web based development workbench.
4) in hana web based development workbench you create an hana xs application. Please refer to below thread it will be useful
8 Easy Steps to Develop an XS application on the SAP HANA Cloud Platform
5) After creating the xs application, you can find your created application in HANA XS Applications.
Attaching you screen shots for reference step 1 step 2 and step 3
Kindly let me know if you face any issues. Thanks.
Regards,
Siddarth Kabde
Hi
Can you share screen shots? also more details of your issue..not very clear.
Some question:
1. What is your CO Area currency?
2. Have you defined Additional currency in Co Code ?
3. Is your profile in consistence with CO code & CO area
Kamal
Dear Hari,
Currency conversion will not happen in the payroll process. once the payroll done and posting to the FI, then currency conversion can be done when you maintain your company code currency as INR.
Hi ,
I followed the steps in :How to Configure Solution Manager 7.1 Time Recording.
But when execute the report "AI_SDK_REPORT_EFFORT" it won't provide the time. I debugged the report and found that the data in the table "CRMD_TIMEREP" is missing. Can anybody please let me know where I am going wrong.
Regards,
Vishal
Hi,
Our job id's are not in sync with their scheduled start/run start time. They are not in increasing order. Please see below screenshot, jobid of the jobs which ran on Feb 19th and Feb 15th are lesser than the jobid's of the jobs which ran before it. Are they not supposed to be bigger than the jobs which ran before them?. Please advise. This happened with many other jobs.
Regards,
Lohit
Hi Experts,
Can you help me on this.
Thanks,
Suresh.
Hello Chandan,
Please refer to below link. Let us know on which version you are.
https://scn.sap.com/thread/3161501
Regards
Niraj