I doubt there is any problem with the number of lines and number of columns
When you have such a problem with a GUI control (CNTL_ERROR), this is due to the methods you have called before the flush. To locate the error, you should trace the GridView control at the frontend. More details in SAP notes, like SAP note 158985 (Automation: How do I generate an automation trace?) -> https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/158985
This really helps Martin. Kudos to your solution.
I am wondering where this detail been mentioned in documentation. Could you please share the help links (if any)?
Regads,
FH
Fixed interest bond.
Rohit Bali
Only for folders under WIZARD folder!
Hi Gurus,
I searched many SCN threads but couldn't get answer to this. Below thread has exactly same requirement but solution is not mentioned.
FM or report or class method | SCN
Is there any FM or CLASS to read Material properties maintained in SPRO. Please let me know.
Thanks,
Jit
Venugopal,
As I inferred from my previous post, there is one or more differences between your two planning books. It is not logical to expect identical results unless the books are identical.
Since the books were originally created at your site, and since only you have access to your system, you are the best one in a position to review which differences are influencing this behavior. Since I don't know anything about your designs, I am not inclined to attempt additional troubleshooting from here.
If you are unable to find the differences on your own, my advice would be to abandon your old Batch book. Delete it, and create a new batch book that is an exact copy of your original Interactive book. Create an identical copy of your original Interactive Macro book.Once the new Batch and Batch Macro book are created, review to ensure that your disaggregation displays are OK.
Once you have convinced yourself that your new Batch book is OK, then you can begin to alter it to meet the requirements of your Batch processes.
Best Regards & Good Luck,
DB49
Hi all
I had the same problem -- and it works now!
Thx
Matt
Hello Anais,
Thankyou so much. the issue is resolved now. Some how iam not able to reward points.
Regards,
Jithin
Hi Bert
I was struggling with the same but that was because I put an if in my code, if transaction = FBL3N then perform the code to derive the vendor.
However, if you run it in the background, the transaction is empty.
So maybe you have the same 'if'...
Koen
Carlos,
I am trying to setup Memo accounts as P&L accounts. But these P&L accounts doesn't show opening and closing balance, with third party solution , SAP Note is obsolete.
Were you able to set these Memo GL account as P&L or B/S accounts?
Hi,
Looking back at the incident notes it appears it was note 2284855, which was included in kernel patch 325 (kernel 742),
Rob
Hi,
I am using Visual Studio 13 for my one of the project in C#. What are the DLL I can include so I do not have to install Crystal report at set up time.
Thanks
Kamal
Hi All,
We are trying to redirect the user to a different URL when SAP ECC AS is down.
User is interacting with the application through a simple HTML Based web application(No Enterprise Portal/WDA).
After doing a lot of research, i found out that we should configure the Web Dispatcher as Reverse Proxy to achieve this. But, i am only getting information on these in context of SAP Enterprise Portal.
Kindly, share some resources or suggestions in case of only SAP NW ECC and External Web Application related landscapes.
Thanks
Sahil
Using the process in 1383316 does prevent the error however when I refresh the worksheet unchecks the "hidden" protection box and makes the formula visible again even after I check the keep formulas static that reference report cells and Restore dynamic selection on refresh after navigation.
Hello Saurabh,
Having old RFCs sitting around doesn't effect the DB unless we're talking 100s of thousands as you will then most likely take a performance hit on the *RFC* tables.
If as you say the failed RFCs are *very* old, just for your own security, check with the users or functional owners involved.
The way I look at it, if they are seriously old then deleting probably wont be a problem as if they were critical someone would have complained or remarked by now.
As a guardian of the system I am generally loathe to delete data unless I get it confirmed as these things have a way of coming back and biting you later.
KR,
Amerjit
I used scenario 7 and followed the cookbook so I actually created a new IRS MEDI plan and only set it up for employee and children coverage options (not spouse). I also setup the cost to be $115.00 for EE only coverage. I enrolled the my dummy employee all year in the plan (EE plus child coverage). I also setup my dummy IRS MEDI plan with the required plan characteristics in table V_T77BENUS_ASPCC.
http://scn.sap.com/message/16662484
Hi, as the ALNUM check table T606H contains the GEGRU as additional key fields, my answer from this threat also applies:
Two Type3 entities GEGRU, ALNUM with a leading relationship between them.
Include via referencing/qualifying relationship (as the case may be).
Good luck, Ingo Bruß
Marty;
We are just now coding that BAdI for the same reasons you gave. We are doing it now because our HR department just told us we need to put our subsidiaries on Part IV. But since we distributed our 1095-C's in March, and the BAdI is called from the Collect program, according to section 2.10.4 of the user guide, I think that it will not work for us in the 2015 reporting year. Would you agree?
Does anyone know of a way around this without re-running the Collect?
BTW we did get some excitement today by having our AATS accepted.
Thanks,
Andrew
Hi Monish,
Its working thank u
Hello Raghuraman
I have not seen this option before where is it?
Is it available in Runtime workbench?
Note:- We use XI 7.0 is this feature avaliable in this version.
Regards
Anant Raman
