Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8676 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: All iViews are empty in General Information Workset

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

Issue resolved, this is due to not having proper authorization provided to the user in backend,

 

Authentication to the Generic iView WebDynpro is provided and also included all the services available in "General Information" page to authorizations.

 

Thanks and regards,

Bhavin Anajwala


Re: Reg:Non editable field required for screen exit in iw23

$
0
0

Hi Rasmiraj,

 

This does not depend on screen number. There is something on the coding / activation areas you have to look into.

Otherwise this is a very much used feature by me.

 

Hope you are writing the code in the PBO of the screen.

Capture.JPG

Jogeswara Rao K

MDGC 6.1 : SWNCONFIG : How can we customize the notification mail body?

Re: CIN number should be displyed in Excise invoice output

$
0
0

Thanks to both for your help.

 

Could you please confirm whether i can maitain SM30 or ABAP guy needs to maintain these values ?

 

thanks,

Re: Getting Short Dump while DSO Activation

$
0
0

Please post your NetWeaver, OS, database and kernel version.

Re: Variant configuration

$
0
0

Ali k,

 

Whats the type of dependency you are using for assigning this quantity?

 

you should use procedure as mention by Amber too.

 

can you please share details of characterstic ABC?

 

Thanks

Ritesh

Re: Duet Enterprise 2.0 -  Accessing SAP DMS Documents

$
0
0

Hello Helen,

 

Thanks for the very useful information. Will go ahead and try to implement it.

 

Thanks,

Kamal

Re: Drag and drop functionality in CM25

$
0
0

Hello Jez,

 

AV10 calls, from what I have been able to find out, the same exit that menu option Functions -> User (so enhancement CY190001). However, I could not as yet find a way to know where the user has dropped the object (to do the check, and to be able to continue with AV09 afterwards). The enhancement documentation only mentions how to get more information about the object, but not about where it was dropped.

 

I am trying to use this to solve http://scn.sap.com/thread/3534956.

 

Have you managed to find anything else on your side?

 

Regards,

Rui


Whitelist for dynamic destination SM59

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

In SM59 screen, i see an red alert symbol No RFC call back check (rfc/callback_security_method undefined).

Also an entry Whitelist for dynamic destination

What are these entries? Is this required?

Can these entries(Whitelist) be removed from the the screen?

rfc/callback_security_method is dynamically switcable but not able to change the value to from RZ11. Does this needs to be declared in profile parameter first? If so what value needs to be set?

 

Kindly let me know, I read the documentation for rfc/callback_security_method. Not sure what value to be set.

 

Parameter

rfc/callback_security_method

Short text

Permit or deny execution of RFC callbacks in accordance with configured whitelist and write corresponding entry in Security Audit Log.

Parameter Description

  • Value 0: Emergency mode (fallback).
    • If callbacks have been forbidden by a previous call of the function module RFC_CALLBACK_REJECTED, the callback is rejected. Otherwise, the callback is executed.
    • All whitelist entries for RFC callbacks (including the active entires) are ignored.
  • Value 1: Default mode (compatibility mode).
    • If callbacks have been forbidden by a previous call of the function module RFC_CALLBACK_REJECTED, the callback is rejected.
    • If the callback is forbidden by an active whitelist, it is rejected.
    • In all other cases, the callback is permitted.
    • Every permitted callback is logged in the Security Audit Log with a "non-critical" (green) entry. Every rejected callback is logged with a "critical" (red) entry.
  • Value 2: Simulation Mode.
    • If callbacks have been forbidden by a previous call of the function module RFC_CALLBACK_REJECTED, the callback is rejected.
    • If the callback is forbidden by an active whitelist, it is rejected.
    • In all other cases, the callback is permitted.
    • Every rejected callback is logged with a "critical" (red) entry in the Security Audit Log. Every permitted callback, which would have been rejected if the whitelist had been activated, is also logged with a "critical" (red) entry in the Security Audit Log. All other permitted callbacks are logged with a "non-critical" (green) entry.
  • Value 3: Most Secure Mode:
    • If callbacks have been forbidden by a previous call of the function module RFC_CALLBACK_REJECTED, the callback is rejected.
    • If the callback is forbidden by an active or inactive whitelist, it is rejected. (Note that, in this mode, an inactive whitelist has the same effect as an active whitelist.)
    • In all other cases, the callback is permitted.
    • Every rejected callback is logged with a "critical" (red) entry in the Security Audit Log. Every permitted callback is logged with a "non-critical" (green) entry.

 


Regards

Shashi

Re: Still to be deliver value is different from total PO value

$
0
0

Hi,

   Did you check the header - condition tab whether any header condition has been added to the PO. Also refer the points and KBA mentioned in my previous comment.

 

Regards,

AKPT

Re: Reg:Non editable field required for screen exit in iw23

$
0
0

Try the first line of the syntax like this and see.

 

IF SY-TCODE <> 'IW21’  AND  SY-TCODE <> 'IW22’ .


(Further, there is no disadvantage for the field being editable, because this can not be save from IW23)


Re: SAP_XXX files in work directory

$
0
0

Hi ,

 

Can you attach one file here.

 

 

Thanks

Siva

Re: BO Advance analysis 1.1.4, Info Field like Last Data Update Table

$
0
0

Krishna  - I recommend creating a new thread in the Analysis Office space

 

I am not using HANA so perhaps other experts can assist.

 

Thank you,

Tammy

Re: Entries not displayed in cost analysis

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

Issue got resolved by checking the Note:1008663

Re: Strucked in Preprocessing phase of upgradation of Solution Manager 7.1 Sps 4 to Sps8


Re: BPC - Why YTD mode for Consolidation model when Conaolidation is done month by month?

$
0
0

Hi Peri,

 

It's a bad idea to post the same question number of times. About your question - please talk with finance people!

 

Vadim

Re: extend field char length of netprice

$
0
0

Hi,

   NETPR allows maximum length of 11 including 2 (or the decimal defined in OY04 for the currency) decimal places. Your currency amount is 34227347 which is of 8 digit only. So standard SAP will allow to maintain the amount as long as the total amount (Quantity x 34227347) calculates less than the maximum length for total item price (13 char with 2 decimal). Consider exchange rate also. If the decimal places is defined differently, the remaining digits will be changed accordingly keeping the maximum length as constant.

   If the quantity is more, you may split it in to two line items.

   If system is not behaving as explained, please share the error message number and the SAP release.

 

Regards,

AKPT

Re: Unable to create  previous emloyement tax details through IT delarations

$
0
0

I did check this.The configuration are standard .No changes have been made to the time constraints

Re: Can we use USMD_MDAT authorizations for MDG-M?

$
0
0

Hi Kiran, checked the correction measure - it's specific for 7.0, not relevant for 6.1 -> no downport needed.

Best regards, Ingo

Re: Issue with replicating in ECC

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

Issue got resolved by checking Note:1008663

 

Thanks

Viewing all 8676 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images