Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8676 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: EPMLocalMember formula goes wrong in a dynamic expandable report

$
0
0

So that it won't impact existing hierarchy(they do not need to add member in the existing hierarchy), and the local member can be easily inserted after particular member as shown in the screenshot.


Re: SuccessFactors Talent > 2nd level manager role based permission

$
0
0

You would essentially segregate your existing role into two roles. Your existing manager role would stay the same, but the new role would give read access to direct reports and 1 level below.

Re: DR Server using Oracle Standby Database - Cross Platform

$
0
0

Hello Nirav

 

As the two platform does not share the same endianness replication is not supported for either physical or logical standby, so replication from HP to Linux is not possible.

 

Best regards

 

Data Guard Support for Heterogeneous Primary and Physical Standbys in Same Data Guard Configuration (Doc ID 413484.1)

PLATFORM_ID

PLATFORM_NAME
Release name

PLATFORM_IDs supported within the same Data Guard configuration when using Data Guard Redo Apply (Physical Standby)

3

HP-UX (64-bit)
HP-UX PA-RISC

3
4 - Oracle 10g onward, see Support
Note: 395982.1 and Note:414043.1

4

HP-UX IA (64-bit)
HP-UX Itanium

4
3 - Oracle 10g onward, see Support Notes
Note: 395982.1 and Note:414043.1

 

What differences are allowed between a Primary Database and a Data Guard Logical Standby Database (SQL Apply)?

PLATFORM_ID

PLATFORM_NAME
Release name

PLATFORM_IDs supported within the same Data Guard configuration when using Data Guard SQL Apply (Logical Standby)

3

HP-UX (64-bit)
HP-UX PA-RISC

3, 4

4

HP-UX IA (64-bit)
HP-UX Itanium

3, 4

Re: Air Ticket Enchantments

Re: SAP XS Advanced Builder not available

Re: SAP XS Advanced Builder not available

$
0
0

Hi Todd,

I'm really quite happy that you could solve the issueand showed us the right way to fix this problem.

Thanks!

Re: How to call second Entity from First Entity

$
0
0

Hi Sai,

 

Thanks alot for the Reply and this is what i am looking for.

 

But i have got a little doubt whle checking the code.

 

Can you please share me/send me your email id , so that i can ask you my doubt .

 

Please send me your email on gphanikumar90@gmail.com

or Please whats app your number @ 9014064666

License key for One Hardware key and two S-User Id (Same Server)

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

I need to apply license file for two companies (Two Databases) using the same server . I have got two S-User Id . How to apply with the same hardware key? Please help on this.

 

Thank You


Re: Using setBindingContext in List with named model

Re: Air Ticket Encashment

Re: Define several OData models asynchronously

$
0
0

don't know what you are talking....

model declaration is just one line code...nothing to wait, after that line,  you can call directly

Re: Error to get schema name of Hana MDC in Cloud

$
0
0

David,

in a nutshell: with a HANA MDC instance all the workarounds which we needed to add for HCP before, are gone now!

 

So there is no pre-created schema for you anymore. You just create users and schemas yourself with names you define. (CREATE USER/SCHEMA SQL statements).

 

Also, for XS development the stored procedures for activating your applications are not there anymore. You just use the activation button. You can now pretty much follow all of the standard HANA tutorials without special alterations for HCP.

 

Some restrictions still apply regarding management of the whole MDC system, but within the tenant database created for you (your HANA MDC Trial instance) you can do pretty much anything...

 

Best regards,

Oliver

Re: ABLDT value date - Simple Finance asset migration

$
0
0

Hi Ranu,

 

Thanks for reply !!!

 

I checked with AS01 and then with ABLDT system give error for standard transaction type 970.

 

But this is not issue we can always use AS01 and ABSO for current year but as per ABLDT document, it is possible to migrate mid year data.

 

Question is how?

 

I am using transaction now for testing not BAPI. Could you please help me if we can post current year.

 

Thanks,
Vishal Pant

Re: BPC Script Logic: Lookup LImitation

Re: Analyze Capture fails in Workload Analyzer

$
0
0

NOTE: Not sure how much troubleshooting you've done so far .. so some of this may be a repeat of what you already know ... ymmv ...

 

I'm looking at the installsybcatdb script that comes with ASE 16.0 SP02 PL03 and I'm not seeing anything (obviously) wrong with the T-SQL code:

 

- a table is created called t_baseprocedures (procname varchar(100), proctext varchar(16100))

 

- an entry is added to t_baseprocedures:

 

     insert into t_baseprocedures values ('p_addcapreqtds',"create procedure p_addcapreqtds ....")

 

- a proc named p_setupanalysisenv cursors through t_baseprocedures replacing the proc name with 'proc name' + "_cap" + <number>, and then uses the new source code to create a new proc:

 

     @newprocname = @procname + "_cap" + @logicalcapid

     @proctext = str_replace(@proctext, @procname, @newprocname)

     ....

     exec(@proctext)

 

------------------

 

I'm not at the point (yet) of creating a ASE 16.0 server, but running the above code snippets (via isql) in a ASE 15.7 dataserver shows no problems with generating the proc 'p_addcapreqtds_cap_5'

 

For your situation, it sounds like the installsybcapdb script was installed (ie, p_setupanalysisenv is being run but the exec(@proctext) is failing) but there's either a problem with your installsybcapdb script, or a bug with the client application (COCKPIT?) that installed the script, sooooo, short of opening a case with tech support, I'm wondering if you can troubleshoot (and fix) the issue yourself?

 

Have you reviewed the installsybcapdb script for any glaring issues with the T-SQL code (eg, missing space between the 'procedure' and 'p_addcapreqtds' strings where the record is added to the t_baseprocedures table)?

 

Could you look at the following items in your sybcatdb database:

 

- has the t_baseprocedures table been created?

 

- does the following return anything:

 

     select * from t_baseprocedures where procname = 'p_addcapreqtds'

 

- if the above does return a record, does the source code include a space between the words 'procedure' and 'p_addcapreqtds'?

 

- if the space is missing, update the record to include a space between 'procedure' and 'p_addcapreqtds' [NOTE: You'll probably want to review the other chunks of source code in t_baseprocedures for any other syntax issues)

 

- can you manually create the proc in question (p_addcapreqtds_cap_5) by running the following:

 

     exec p_setupanalysisenv 5

 

- if calling the proc generates an error, take a look at the source code for p_setupanalysisenv, perhaps add some 'print' commands before and after modifying @proctext ... see if that shines a light on the issue?


Problems with the syntax of rules,Is there any automated content type checking in SAP BOIS?

$
0
0

Hi All

     I am facing problems with my syntax in the the rule in SAP BOIS. I tried using the Lookup functions in the Begin section:

rules.jpg 

 

Please help me out with this  I just wanted to know where can i find the details of creating complex rules using "Advanced Rule editor"??

 

Regards

Re: Message mapping issue

$
0
0

Thanks for reply my payload like -  Anytown|#12345|ABC123XX|04012016|C520|5W

SDP Alerts extracts

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have to extract the APO SNP database alerts from table "/SAPAPO/AM_ALERT",  the table shows object ID details and not material & location details.

I have verified the tables MATKEY, LOCMAP, MATLOC  but no luck.

 

Can you please help in identifying the relation for mapping between object ID with Material & location combination and extraction of data base alerts from table /SAPAPO/AM_AlERT

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Regards

Ashwin

Re: Configurable Article in SAP retail

$
0
0

Hi Lindsay,

 

Sorry, I understood your question wrongly.

 

Well, configuration items, I am not familiar, so please wait for an expert to revert on this.

 

Regards,

Amit

Re: Alternative Inputs on BOM

$
0
0

Hi Ruben,

it is a true priority and things like allocation or quota cannot be applied automatically. Demand affects the variants by the validity (time and lot size) of the respective production model, meaning you can e.g. use production model 1 for a smaller lot size and production model 2 for bigger lot sizes.

Best regards,

Stefan

Viewing all 8676 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images