Hello,
I am a B.Tech Graduate in Mechanical Engineering and also have a Masters degree in it. I have 3 years work experience in Wind Energy (Renewable Energy) sector. I want to pursue a career in ERP. Can anyone suggest me which module is best for me?
Hi Maha,
You are describing something theoretical... What about practical description?
In general KPI's are members with dimension formula of the account dimension.
B.R. Vadim
Hi Jain,
In solution Manager 7.1,please use the SMIN transaction for incident management.
Please check the below link for SMIN email configuration.
Incident Management and Change Request Management: E-Mail functionality in SAP Solution Manager 7.1
Please check the below link for new Transaction Types in SAP Solution Manager 7.1
ITSM & ChaRM
https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700000911492011E/
Rg,
Karthik
From the screen shot above, it looks like you are trying to create using PA30 and not PA40. Hopefully you have your hiring action configured correctly in your system. If so, do a copy on the hiring action via PA30 and see if it will allow you to create the IT0001 record after successfully recreating the IT0000 record.
That comes already in the BI Workspace. You can create content panels exposing a certain Public Folder area and it will via the existing security only show content that the user can access just as if he or she were navigating content in BI Launchpad.
Hi everyone,
I have a doubt on how to select part of string.
For example in the following code, in city from it may get the value 'NEW YORK CITY' instead of that I wanna show only 'NEW York'.
Is it possible to do NOT fix to a number of positions. In case to remove 'City' from 'Rio de Janeiro City'.
DATA: carrid TYPE s_carr_id,
connid TYPE s_conn_id,
cityfrom TYPE s_from_cit,
cityto TYPE s_to_city.
START-OF-SELECTION.
SELECT carrid connid cityfrom cityto FROM spfli
INTO (carrid, connid, cityfrom, cityto) UP TO 1 ROWS.
ENDSELECT.
WRITE: / carrid,
/ connid,
/ cityfrom,
/ cityto.
Hi. Anuja. has accounting document generated.? Because once the accounting document generates there no fields we can change apart from output types. I think in your scenario there are no accounting documents generated. may be , because of that reason The pricing has changed after the invoice. In order to solve this , in billing type uncheck posting block check box......
I Think it might helpful.
regards, ADITHYA
Hi expert,
Can we bring system control on stock through physical sample lot. If yes then please help me to provide the steps as in our client following is the business scenario and requirement.
Business scenario : Tankers arrives the plant and sampling is been done. If sample is approved then GRN is been done.
Requirement : Can system can block GRN of material against certain PO if sample is rejected ?
Regards,
Sun
Hi Chandra
Looking at the screen shot i understand the reason. Actually the workflow is sending the workitems to SAP userid as it is classified as general task but no approver is found. The moment you execute one it gets reserved under you name. So the two tasks which you have found with your name are those and if you look at the READY status task it does not have any approver(since it is in everyone inbox) it does not allow you to process it. Simple solution is to correct the workflow agent determination logic
Just to add i was successfully able to implement this approval stuff without the need of making my workitems from Ready to In process because of the reason mentioned above.
Thanks
Nabheet
You'll need to host the CSS and Font files on the BI Platform's folder structure and update the MIME Repository references to the new locations.
Thank you kindly Dawson!
I have the same issue. When trying to search for Disputes from within CRM, the search by Business partner # gives the error:
'No mapping of business partner &1 found'
Any help with this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Lankesh
I think "as separate unit" should take care of the same session issue.
In the Custom function module which is called in Background and as separate unit, can you add a wait statement for 5 seconds and then call 2nd goods movement call and commit? I think this will ensure that the first commit has been already done.
FYI...a co-worker helped me resolve my issue. I set both $CDHDR_Last_Run_Date_Time and $Run_Date_Time to varchar(14) and in the format of 'YYYYMMDDHHMISS'.
Then here's my ABAP data flow where clause:
CDHDR.OBJECTCLAS in ('DEBI', 'KRED', 'MATERIAL')
and ((CDHDR.UDATE || CDHDR.UTIME) > $CDHDR_Last_Run_Date_Time_Char)
and ((CDHDR.UDATE || CDHDR.UTIME) <= $Run_Date_Time_Char)
Here's selected contents of the generated ABAP file (*.aba):
PARAMETER $PARAM1(14) TYPE C.
PARAMETER $PARAM2(14) TYPE C.
...
DATA ALTMP1(512) TYPE C.
DATA ALTMP2(512) TYPE C.
...
concatenate CDHDR-UDATE CDHDR-UTIME into ALTMP1.
concatenate CDHDR-UDATE CDHDR-UTIME into ALTMP2.
IF ( ( ALTMP2 <= $PARAM2 )
AND ( ALTMP1 > $PARAM1 ) ).
Since in the generated ABAP file all of the fields are varchar with concatenated date and time, I can easily pull the CDHDR deltas.
-Brad
I have to take that back I found the documentation that explains it and it is possible to add t an existing merge dimension in 4.1.
Hello,
BusinessObjects Analysis is supposed to be the BEX successor
The here under documents should help you to find if it fits your needs
Regards
BEx Analyzer vs. Analysis for MS Office
A Detailed Comparison of SAP BusinessObjects Analysis for Office vs SAP BEx Analyzer
Official Product Tutorials – SAP BusinessObjects Analysis
SAP BusinessObjects Analysis, edition for Microsoft Office
For example I have tried to execute ST22 and tried to open a dump...then immediately it popup the error message as shown above
Hello,
I am a little bit confused 
I now understood that all Fiori UI components of the first wave are now in the component UIX01EAP. But what is the difference between UIEAAP01 and UIX02EAP? If I navigate in SWDC to Installations and Upgrades - F" SAP Fiori" SAP Fiori for Suite" FIORI ERP APPLICATIONS X2" FIORI ERP APPLICATIONS X2 1.0 I only finde the component UIX02EAP, but I also read about UIEAAP01 for the second wave apps???
Thank you,
Igor
Message was edited by: Michael Appleby
Hi Aravind,
I think this is related to custom exit created at your end.
Check with your developer.
Regards,
Ravi
Dear HANA Gurus,
We have setup SLT to replicate some tables from ECC to HANA for SAP Fraude all working fine. Now development came to me with the question if it was possible to to create views on top of this schema for other propose than than Fraude. This because this new application can make use of the all ready replicated tables in HANA. In a management point of view i would suggest to create a new schema for the new application but than would some tables exist twice in the same HANA system. I guess that would also not be a good idea.
What are the guidelines in this scenario? Would you setup one schema per replicated sytem and develop multiple applications on top or create multiple schemas per application function?
Thanks in advance
Glenn van Rooij
