Hi,
please have a check against the copy control at item level for that item category in sales contract
Hi,
please have a check against the copy control at item level for that item category in sales contract
Hi Kumar,
We already created Z report for pending PR services, but i am unable get pending service PR list, is there any field or table to get exact service PR pending Value. please give some suggestion.
Regards,
B V
Hi Kumar,
We already created Z report for pending PR services, but i am unable get pending service PR list, is there any field or table to get exact service PR pending Value. please give some suggestion.
Regards,
B V
Have you ever tried to search in SCN or Google about your requirement ?
Please always search before posting.
Dear Sriram,
Thanks for the link. I have already referred it.
I am still stuck at point upgrading HR 604 to 608. How should I calculate stack for delta upgrade?
I have already installed latest support pack stack of EHP7.
Let me know if you have any more information on this.
Thanks,
Srikanth
Hi All,
I have configured the Track Purchase order Fiori App in Launchpad, and followed the instruction from fiori help portal http://help.sap.com/fiori_bs2013/helpdata/en/f9/433a5224ecb810e10000000a44176d/frameset.htm
to install and configure the app.
Purchase Order list is not loading by default when I'm opening the Track PO app, but when i search by PO number, Sometimes PO list is loading, sometimes its not loading.
Did any one faced this issue?
Regards
Yokesvaran Kumarasamy
Hi Haseeb,
Queues are in waiting state?. What about the bdoc?.
While you extended the material to the sales area, have you done the corresponding configuration in CRM side also to match the data with?.
Thanks,
Faisal
Closed...
HI
when i check the code in ATC, i got some warnings and how to overcome those warnings with out using Pseudo comments?
Why this is not available ? Did you not find the path ?
Hi Sriram,
If i have deleted an app from the config portal including all the data within the app like BAPI Wrapper and MDO linking EFI assignment etc and i need to restore it, in this cenario what do i do.
Thanks,
Rohan
Hi Swaroop,
Thanks for your response.
Thanks,
Satyam
Hi,
Refresh the RFC metadata by starting/stopping the communication channel.
Regards,
Mark
You currently cannot post the invoice.
If you expect a goods receipt almost immediately, you may be able to enter the invoice using invoice verification type 2, where the invoice is checked later on in the background. If the goods receipt has been posted, the invoice will be posted in the background.
If the goods receipt is not due so soon, you can enter the invoice using the invoice verification type 3 (do not check) and post it later.
Hi Santosh,
You can better try to sort the internal table using Date and Time.
It will work perfectly
BR,
RAM.
Hi Shiva,
Hi Siva, Refer Balamurugan reply.
It will help. Otherwise open a new thread.
Please change your design like below.
1. Join two tables using LEFT OUTER JOIN on IFLOT_AB.TPLNR = IFLOT_X.TPLNR and add IFLOT_X.TPLNR into query mapping.
2. After join condition add one more query transform and in where condition where IFLOT_X.TPLNR is NULL. Now you will get a list of values from left table which are not in the right table.
Thanks & Regards,
Balamurugan G
Dear Experts need your guidance to resolve this.
We had initially 4.1 SP3, things were ok barring slow performance and some minor issues. We updated to SP4, problems started with AnswerExPrompts, split of merged prompts, crashing of APS server while refreshing WEBI reports based on multisource UNX. we were told these issues are fixed in FP4.4 and we applied it. Now we regret applying SP04 and FP4.4. It created following problems;
Environment : Windows 2012 Server with BI 4.1 SP04 FP4.4. datasource SQL Server 2012. ODBC DSN based on SQL Server
In single source universe;
(A) all date objects not parsing. When investigated we found database has date fields defined as datetime whereas in datafoundation in the structure it is showing as Timestamp. Since Timestamp gives binary values it is not parsing.
Change of date field structure in DF will be a big and risky task as there are quite a few date fields as well as if we add any additional table with dates we will have to do the same for it.
(B) When reports with date prompts based on the another UNX (which we did not check integrity or do anything post update) refreshed takes date correctly as dd/mm/yyyy from prompt calendar. but gives wrong result. Example if I take 01/01/2014 (Jan) to 10/01/2014 (Jan) for 10 days it gives result for 01/01/2014 to 01/10/2014 (9 months 1 day).
When we checked the SQL script within report post refresh it shows date being compared with mm/dd/yyyy format. Strange!!!
We have not defined any format for date objects in the universe. Server/Client Regional setting is English UK, PVL in CMC is set to English UK and -Duser.timezone=UTC set in Apache Tomcat Java Configuration. But with no success so far.
What is surprising that all these reports were validated in SP3, now all have gone for toss.
Please help as this is frustrating us and there is no option of reverting back to SP3 due to security permissions and involvement of multiple departments in carrying out the exercise.
Our UAT is delayed.
Thanks in Advance
Thanks Vivek..Thats really helpful.
hi
material tyep-NALG
item category-TAX when this is using system not check any storage location , picking quantity
so we can use this .